Early reviews. Critics give Sky Full of Holes an early B-Side Breakdown of 73 (Keeper), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Sky Full of Holes
Most critics weren't won over: 4 of 6 liked it.
- Outlier 100 Americana UK, 20 points above the next-highest score
- Lowest 60 Slant and AllMusic
- Career #3 of Fountains of Wayne's 5 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Fountains of Wayne's best-reviewed album here since Welcome Interstate Managers (2003).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Americana UK via Wikipedia | 10/10 | 100 | 2011 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | “It's a more sedate Fountains of Wayne on their fifth album, but they're the better for it, reckons Michael Hann” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Stacey Anderson | 7/10 | 70 | 2011 | “The "Stacy's Mom" jangle-pop purveyors offer plenty of excellent cues for summertime activities on their perky fifth album, from passing out on tables” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jody Rosen | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2011 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Sky Full of Holes on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jonathan Keefe | 3/5 | 60 | 2011 | “Ultimately, it’s a matter of aesthetic choices that just don’t play to Fountains of Wayne’s considerable strengths.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Sky Full of Holes in Fountains of Wayne's catalog
How these critics usually treat Fountains of Wayne
- AllMusic Harsher than usual16 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Fountains of Wayne's other albums (4).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them4 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Fountains of Wayne's other albums (3).
More from Fountains of Wayne
More Indie & Alternative from around 2011
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply