Era Vulgaris

Queens of the Stone Age – Era Vulgaris: B-Side Breakdown 78 (C+) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Era Vulgaris by Queens of the Stone Age
Released June 8, 2007
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Queens of the Stone Age

Era Vulgaris

78
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 8 critics · 88% approval
B-Side Breakdown78Grade: C+
Approval88%7 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 14 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 62 to 88.

By the numbers: 7 of 8 critics liked it, with Pitchfork the lone holdout at 62. The fourth best-reviewed Rock album of 2007 we've tracked.

020406080100Pitchfork: 62Los Angeles Times: 75Entertainment Weekly: 78Uncut: 80Rolling Stone: 80NME: 80AllMusic: 80The A.V. Club: 88 Breakdown 78
The gist
The A.V. Club via Wikipedia B+ 88 2007 “Queens Of The Stone Age: Era Vulgaris”
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2007 “Check out our album review of Artist's Era Vulgaris on Rolling Stone.com.”
NME via Wikipedia 8/10 80 2007 “Calling your new record “Common Era” takes guts – especially if, merely years before, you were the figurehead of the greatest band on the planet. Circa 2002’s ‘Songs For The…”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia C+ 78
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 3/4 75 2007 “Queens of the Stone Age "Era Vulgaris" (Interscope) * * * Abrilliant album. Just not too friendly.”
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 6.2/10 62 2007 “Josh Homme and co. follow their first post-Nick Oliveri album– the quality Lullabies to Paralyze– with a more diverse record, one that tries its best to be everything all at…”

More from Queens of the Stone Age

See all Queens of the Stone Age albums ranked

More Rock from around 2007

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply