Early reviews. Critics give Maid of Honour an early B-Side Breakdown of 62 (Mixed Bag), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Maid of Honour
Critics split on this one: scores run from 40 (The Guardian and 1 other) to 80 (Rolling Stone and 1 other).
- Highest 80 Rolling Stone and Pitchfork
- Lowest 40 The Guardian and The Arts Desk
- Career Tied for #11 of Drake's 18 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Drake's best-reviewed album here since Honestly, Nevermind (2022).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jeff Ihaza | 4/5 | 80 | May 18, 2026 | “Drake turns Kendrick Lamar's "Not Like Us" victory inside out with a three-album statement of purpose that stands against rigid ideas of authenticity” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Alphonse Pierre | 8.0/10 | 80 | May 19, 2026 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Kyann-Sian Williams | 3.5/5 | 70 | May 22, 2026 | “Drake’s chaotic triple-album stunt is undoubtedly bloated, but also surprisingly revealing and unexpectedly listenable.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Kiana Fitzgerald | C+ | 55 | May 1, 2026 | “Drake spends three albums — Iceman, Maid of Honour, and Habibti — reliving old glories, revisiting old grudges, and insisting he emerged from the Kendrick Lamar feud untouched.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 2/5 | 40 | May 15, 2026 | “It’s possible that the world’s biggest rapper is using this epic content drop to get out of his record deal, but aside from some bright spots on Iceman, should the…” |
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Thomas H. Green | 2/5 | 40 | May 15, 2026 | “Drake just released not only his expected ninth album, Iceman, but another two albums, Maid of Honour and Habibti. Forty-three songs. Two-and-a-half hours of music. And a trying listen for…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Maid of Honour in Drake's catalog
How these critics usually treat Drake
- The Guardian Harsher than usual26 points below the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Drake's other albums (11).
- The Arts Desk Harsher than usual26 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Drake's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual21 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Drake's other albums (17).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual9 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Drake's other albums (14).
- NME Kinder than usual9 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Drake's other albums (14).
- Rolling Stone Kinder than usual21 points above the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Drake's other albums (14).
More from Drake
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2026
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply