Early reviews. Critics give Breakup Song an early B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Breakup Song
5 of 6 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 85 Consequence
- Lowest 72 Pitchfork
- Career Tied for #3 of Deerhoof's 13 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Deerhoof's best-reviewed album here since Friend Opportunity (2007). The second best-reviewed Pop album of 2012 we've tracked.
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Adam Kivel | B | 85 | 2012 |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Dan Weiss | B- | 81 | 2012 |
| Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipediaby Conrad Tao | 4/5 | 80 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Noel Gardner | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Masters | 7.2/10 | 72 | 2012 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Breakup Song in Deerhoof's catalog
How these critics usually treat Deerhoof
- NME Kinder than usualLevel with the other critics here. Usually 15 points below on Deerhoof's other albums (4).
- Pitchfork Harsher than usual9 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Deerhoof's other albums (10).
- The A.V. Club Harsher than usual2 points above the other critics here. Usually 12 points above on Deerhoof's other albums (3).
- Tiny Mix Tapes About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Deerhoof's other albums (3).
- AllMusic About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Deerhoof's other albums (12).
More from Deerhoof
← Earlier Deerhoof vs. Evil (2011)Later → La Isla Bonita (2014)
More Pop from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply