Critics give Donkey a B-Side Breakdown of 53 (Back of the Crate), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 20 to 70.
The verdict on Donkey
Most critics weren't won over: 1 of 10 liked it.
- Highest 70 NME
- Outlier 20 Uncut, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career Tied for #2 of CSS's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers CSS's best-reviewed album here since Cansei de Ser Sexy (2005).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2008 | “CSS’ debut was a collection of postmodern private gags set to acrobatic electro bleeps and thuds. It was brilliant, a defining record of 2006, but a gnawing doubt remained; were…” |
| PopMattersby Daniel Rivera | 6/10 | 60 | 2008 | “CSS and the impressive reputation that they've garnered over the past couple of years can easily be attributed to their brash predilection towards” |
| musicOMHby Gemma Hampson | 3/5 | 60 | 2008 | “We all loved them first time round. Even if you hated their funky punk electro dance bop, you had to love checking out Lovefoxxx's sparkly all-in-one” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 3/5 | 60 | 2008 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Eric Harvey | 5.6/10 | 56 | 2008 | |
| Slantby Jonathan Keefe | 2/5 | 40 | 2008 | “CSS’s sophomore effort, Donkey, is one of the year’s biggest disappointments.” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 2/5 | 40 | ||
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 1/5 | 20 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Donkey in CSS's catalog
More from CSS
← Earlier Cansei de Ser Sexy (2005)Later → La Liberación (2011)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2008
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply