Cansei de Ser Sexy

CSS – Cansei de Ser Sexy: B-Side Breakdown 71 (C-) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Cansei de Ser Sexy by CSS
Released October 2005
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
CSS

Cansei de Ser Sexy

71
B-Side BreakdownGrade C- · 10 critics · 60% approval
B-Side Breakdown71Grade: C-
Approval60%6 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Critics give Cansei de Ser Sexy a B-Side Breakdown of 71 (C-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 80.

The verdict on Cansei de Ser Sexy

Most critics weren't won over: 6 of 10 liked it.

  • Highest 80 musicOMH, Uncut, Q and 3 more
  • Outlier 40 Spin, 20 points below the next-lowest score
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of CSS's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Donkey (53).
020406080100Spin: 40Pitchfork: 60Blender: 60AllMusic: 70musicOMH: 80Uncut: 80Q: 80Slant: 80The Guardian: 80Alternative Press: 80 Breakdown 71
The gist
musicOMHby Michael Hubbard 4/5 80 2006 “Brazil. For all its many good points, from football to the Rio carnival, it's a country not usually mentioned in conversations about indie music. At least”
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
Slant via Wikipediaby Jonathan Keefe 4/5 80 2006 “Like former blog darlings Annie and M.I.A., CSS doesn’t have an obvious analogue on either the mainstream or indie-pop scenes.”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson 4/5 80 2006
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Cammila Albertson 3.5/5 70 2006
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Tom Breihan 6.0/10 60 2006 “Patchy and uninspiring debut from São Paulo disco punks and Diplo pals.”
Blender via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2006
Spin via Wikipediaby Chuck Eddy 2/5 40 2006

Cansei de Ser Sexy in CSS's catalog

75Cansei de Ser Sexy (2005): 7171This oneDonkey (2008): 5353La Liberación (2011): 53532011
CSS's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every CSS album, ranked

More from CSS

See all CSS albums ranked

More Electronic from around 2005

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply