Based on 14 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (Spectrum Culture) to 100 (Mojo). MGMT's best-reviewed album here since Oracular Spectacular (2007).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | 2009 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Keith Phipps | A- | 91 | 2010 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | B | 85 | ||
| Spin | 8/10 | 80 | 2010 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: April 13, 2010Label: ColumbiaThe closing and title track of MGMT's second album could be a career coda — a tender” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Scott Plagenhoef | 6.8/10 | 68 | 2010 | “MGMT follow the surprise hit Oracular Spectacular by teaming with Spacemen 3’s Sonic Boom for a leftfield psych-pop LP bereft of obvious singles.” |
| Beats Per Minute | 63% | 63 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| NME via Wikipediaby Emily Mackay | 6/10 | 60 | 2010 | “It’s unfair when a new album’s clouded in popular myth before most people have heard it. It’s unfair as, invariably, the received wisdom of industry mutters turns out to be…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson | 3/5 | 60 | 2010 | “MGMT's second album offeres diamonds lurking amid the distractions, reckons Dave Simpson” |
| musicOMH | 3/5 | 60 | “You'd be forgiven if you approached MGMT's second album with some caution, given the pre-publicity surrounding it. The story began when the Brooklyn duo” | |
| PopMatters | 6/10 | 60 | ||
| Slant | 2.5/5 | 50 | “The album is a mildly interesting listen, but proves to be nothing less than a regression into ennui-drenched acid folk mimicry.” | |
| Spectrum Culture | 2.0/5 | 40 | “MGMT Congratulations Rating: 2.0/5.0 Label: Columbia Records Whether you hate MGMT or begrudgingly tolerate them on the basis of a few insanely catchy singles, it’s impossible to deny they know…” |
More from MGMT
More Indie & Alternative from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply