Electric Circus

Common – Electric Circus: B-Side Breakdown 75 (C) from 11 critic reviews.

Album cover for Electric Circus by Common
Released December 10, 2002
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Common

Electric Circus

75
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 11 critics · 64% approval
B-Side Breakdown75Grade: C
Approval64%7 of 11 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 34 points of each other

Critics give Electric Circus a B-Side Breakdown of 75 (C), from 11 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.

The verdict on Electric Circus

Critics split on this one: 7 of 11 liked it.

  • Highest 100 The Guardian
  • Outlier 40 Blender, 20 points below the next-lowest score
  • By the numbers The lowest score of Common's 5 albums with a Breakdown.
020406080100Blender: 40Spin: 60Rolling Stone: 60Pitchfork in 2003: 65Q: 80NME: 80AllMusic: 80Pitchfork in 2017: 84Robert Christgau: 85Entertainment Weekly: 95The Guardian: 100 Breakdown 75
The gist
The Guardian via Wikipediaby David Peschek 5/5 100 2003
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Neil Drumming A 95 2002
Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau B 85 2003
Pitchfork in 2017 via Wikipediaby Hanif Abdurraqib 8.4/10 84 2017
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2005
NME via Wikipediaby Dele Fadele 8/10 80 2005 “In the late 1960s, civil rights struggles, and demonstrations against the Vietnam war in America, gave birth to heavy psychedelia and searing soul music. 2002 in turn finds the parallel…”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Sam Samuelson 4/5 80
Pitchfork in 2003 via Wikipediaby Scott Hreha 6.5/10 65 2003 “Why is it that hip-hop artists have so much trouble reinventing themselves once they're established in then game …”
Spin via Wikipediaby Jon Caramanica 6/10 60 2003
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kathryn McGuire 3/5 60 2003 “Check out our album review of Artist's Electric Circus on Rolling Stone.com.”
Blender via Wikipediaby Rob Marriott 2/5 40 2003

Electric Circus in Common's catalog

75Resurrection (1994): 8080Like Water for Chocolate (2000): 7878Electric Circus (2002): 7575This oneBe (2005): 8484Finding Forever (2007): 767619942007
Common's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Common album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Common

  • Spin Harsher than usual16 points below the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Common's other albums (3).
  • Entertainment Weekly Kinder than usual23 points above the other critics here. Usually 10 points above on Common's other albums (3).
  • Rolling Stone Harsher than usual16 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Common's other albums (4).
  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual11 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Common's other albums (4).
  • NME Kinder than usual6 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Common's other albums (3).
  • AllMusic About usual for them6 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Common's other albums (4).

More from Common

See all Common albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2002

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply