Critics give When the Wind Forgets Your Name a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on When the Wind Forgets Your Name
8 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 AllMusic
- Lowest 60 Record Collector
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Built to Spill's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Keep It Like a Secret (76).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2022 | |
| Under the Radar via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Brandon Miller | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | “Their first LP for Sub Pop, Built to Spill's When the Wind Forgets Your Name ends a seven-year vacancy of original, guitar-tempered indie rock.” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Bruno Coulombe | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Grayson Haven Currin | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Eric R. Danton | 7.7/10 | 77 | 2022 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Evan Rytlewski | 7.2/10 | 72 | 2022 | |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Daniel Dylan Wray | 7/10 | 70 | 2022 | |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Mischa Pearlman | 3/5 | 60 | 2022 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
When the Wind Forgets Your Name in Built to Spill's catalog
How these critics usually treat Built to Spill
- Pitchfork Harsher than usual5 points below the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Built to Spill's other albums (4).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual15 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Built to Spill's other albums (4).
More from Built to Spill
← Earlier Built to Spill Plays the Songs of Daniel Johnston (2020)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2022
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply