Critics give There’s Nothing Wrong with Love a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 100.
The verdict on There’s Nothing Wrong with Love
Critics split on this one: scores run from 50 (MusicHound Rock) to 100 (Melody Maker).
- Highest 100 Melody Maker
- Lowest 50 MusicHound Rock
- Career Tied for #2 of Built to Spill's 5 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melody Maker via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | 2005 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mark Richardson | 9.3/10 | 93 | 2015 | “There’s Nothing Wrong With Love, newly reissued on vinyl after being out of print on the format for almost two decades, has come to define a certain strand of indie…” |
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | A- | 85 | 2005 | |
| Spectrum Culture via Wikipediaby Kevin Korber | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “While it’s something of an anomaly in the band's catalog, There’s Nothing Wrong with Love laid a path for many bands to follow afterwards.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby John Bush | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Mac Randall | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2004 | |
| NME via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2005 | |
| Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin | 3/5 | 60 | 2011 | “The Encyclopedia Of Popular Music is universally recognized as the most comprehensive and authoritative reference work on popular music. This expanded 5th edition is an essential reference book for anyone…” |
| MusicHound Rock via Wikipedia | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2005 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
There’s Nothing Wrong with Love in Built to Spill's catalog
How these critics usually treat Built to Spill
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual19 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Built to Spill's other albums (4).
- AllMusic About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Built to Spill's other albums (4).
More from Built to Spill
More Indie & Alternative from around 1994
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply