Early reviews. Critics give Built to Spill Plays the Songs of Daniel Johnston an early B-Side Breakdown of 65 (Mixed Bag), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Built to Spill Plays the Songs of Daniel Johnston
Most critics weren't won over: 3 of 6 liked it.
- Highest 80 AllMusic
- Outlier 40 PopMatters, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- By the numbers The lowest score of Built to Spill's 5 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | |
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Elingburg Scott D | 7/10 | 70 | 2020 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2022 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jayson Greene | 6.7/10 | 67 | 2020 | “Following a tour together in 2017, Doug Martsch & co. tackle an album’s worth of the Texas singer-songwriter’s work, but they fail to capture the strange and messy spirit that…” |
| No Ripcord via Wikipediaby Juan Edgardo Rodriguez | 6/10 | 60 | 2022 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Justin Vellucci | 4/10 | 40 | 2020 | “Listening to Daniel Johnston is a lot like playing a game of Fill in the Blanks. The core melodies and the song's basic structure are there, and so too is” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Built to Spill Plays the Songs of Daniel Johnston in Built to Spill's catalog
How these critics usually treat Built to Spill
- AllMusic Kinder than usual19 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Built to Spill's other albums (4).
- Pitchfork About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Built to Spill's other albums (4).
More from Built to Spill
← Earlier Untethered Moon (2015)Later → When the Wind Forgets Your Name (2022)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2020
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply