Early reviews. Critics give Slow Attack an early B-Side Breakdown of 64 (D), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Slow Attack
Most critics weren't won over: 1 of 7 liked it.
- Highest 80 Mojo
- Outlier 40 PopMatters, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Brett Anderson's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Brett Anderson (53).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Danny Eccleston | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Joshua Klein | 7.0/10 | 70 | 2010 | “The former Suede singer finds unlikely inspiration in Talk Talk and makes his best solo album.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Martin Robinson | 7/10 | 70 | 2009 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Piers Martin | 3/5 | 60 | 2009 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 3/5 | 60 | 2009 | “Save for "Julian's Eyes", which brings a louche cabaret mood towards the end of the album, Slow Attack finds Brett Anderson in strangely pastoral mode, eschewing the sleazy outsider urban…” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Jennifer Cooke | 4/10 | 40 | 2009 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Brett Anderson
More Indie & Alternative from around 2009
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply