Gallipoli

Beirut – Gallipoli: B-Side Breakdown 72 (Keeper) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Gallipoli by Beirut
Released February 1, 2019
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Beirut

Gallipoli

72
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 9 critics · 56% approval
B-Side Breakdown72Keeper
Approval56%5 of 9 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Critics give Gallipoli a B-Side Breakdown of 72 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 80.

The verdict on Gallipoli

5 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Mojo: 60The Guardian: 60Exclaim!: 60Pitchfork: 66Rolling Stone: 80PopMatters: 80Q: 80NME: 80AllMusic: 80 Breakdown 72
The gist
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes 4/5 80 2019 “From his new base in Berlin — as well as New York and Southern Italy — indie-rock expat Zach Condon delivers his most emotional set yet.”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Spyros Stasis 8/10 80 2019 “Beirut, the band led by Zach Condon, is a very interesting project with a distinct tendency of blending indie rock concepts with a world music perspective.”
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2018
NME via Wikipediaby Hannah Mylrea 4/5 80 2019
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Marcy Donelson 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Sophie Kemp 6.6/10 66 2019 “Zach Condon reunites with his old Farfisa on his fifth album, but otherwise he remains cozily ensconced in his twee wheelhouse.”
Mojo via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal 3/5 60 2018
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Ben Beaumont-Thomas 3/5 60 2019 “Zach Condon’s voice is as lovely as ever, on tracks soothingly yet dismayingly similar to past albums”
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Alex Hudson 6/10 60 2019

Gallipoli in Beirut's catalog

70Gulag Orkestar (2005): 7575The Flying Club Cup (2007): 7373The Rip Tide (2011): 7676No No No (2015): 6363Gallipoli (2019): 7272This oneHadsel (2023): 777720052023
Beirut's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Beirut album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Beirut

  • PopMatters Kinder than usual9 points above the other critics here. Usually 23 points below on Beirut's other albums (3).
  • The Guardian Harsher than usual13 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Beirut's other albums (3).
  • Mojo Harsher than usual13 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Beirut's other albums (3).
  • NME Kinder than usual9 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Beirut's other albums (3).
  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual7 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Beirut's other albums (5).
  • AllMusic About usual for them9 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Beirut's other albums (4).

More from Beirut

See all Beirut albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2019

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply