Ashes & Fire

Ryan Adams – Ashes & Fire: B-Side Breakdown 79 (C+) from 12 critic reviews.

Album cover for Ashes & Fire by Ryan Adams
Released September 11, 2011
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Ryan Adams

Ashes & Fire

79
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 12 critics · 58% approval
B-Side Breakdown79Grade: C+
Approval58%7 of 12 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 28 points of each other

Based on 12 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 100.

By the numbers: Ryan Adams's best-reviewed album here since Heartbreaker (2000). Scores ran from 50 (Slant) to 100 (The Telegraph).

020406080100Slant: 50Pitchfork: 65Spin: 70AllMusic: 70Rolling Stone: 70The Guardian: 80NME: 80The A.V. Club: 85Entertainment Weekly: 88PopMatters: 90The Telegraph: 100Los Angeles Times: 100 Breakdown 79
The gist
The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Bernadette McNulty 5/5 100
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Solvej Schou 4/4 100
PopMatters 9/10 90 2011 “Ryan Adams is the genius critics love to hate: too prolific, too much of a chameleon, too facile, too tortured, too sensitive, too strident, too”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Melissa Maerz B+ 88
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Steven Hyden B 85
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann 4/5 80
NME via Wikipediaby Jamie Crossan 8/10 80
Spin via Wikipediaby Stacey Anderson 7/10 70 “After going certifiably loopy on last year's III/IV, a "double-album concept rock opera," the alt-country bard goes for the diametric opposite on this”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 3.5/5 70
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes 3.5/5 70
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen 6.5/10 65
Slantby Jonathan Keefe 2.5/5 50 2011 “Ryan Adams goes full-on into sensitive troubadour mode on Ashes & Fire.”

More from Ryan Adams

See all Ryan Adams albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2011

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply