Critics give A Different Kind of Human (Step 2) a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
By the numbers: The lowest score of AURORA's 5 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Jack Bray | 9/10 | 90 | 2019 | “The Norwegian artist is developing a unique voice with remarkable pace” |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Ben Hogwood | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “For her second album proper, Aurora goes big. If visual proof were needed for this, compare the cover of last year’s extended EP Infections Of A Different” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Andrew Trendell | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “The NME review of AURORA's third album, 'A Different Kind Of Human (Step 2)” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Cragg | 4/5 | 80 | 2019 | “Breathy Norwegian vocalist whose songs deal with everything from outdated gender roles to climate change invents her own pop” |
| Dork via Wikipediaby Dan Harrison | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Clash via Wikipediaby Malvika Padin | 7/10 | 70 | 2019 | “Norwegian singer Aurora delivers a free-flowing collection of pop tracks on her third album ‘A Different Kind Of Human’ which further elevate” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Marcy Donelson | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Elisa Bray | 3/5 | 60 | 2019 | “Aurora’s conceptual album about the ecological crisis has vocal techniques you don’t expect to find on a pop album, while Perry Farrell proves he still has plenty of fire in…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from AURORA
More Pop from around 2019
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply