Critics give Punk a B-Side Breakdown of 74 (C), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
The verdict on Punk
Most critics weren't won over: 3 of 8 liked it.
- Outlier 100 NME, 20 points above the next-highest score
- Lowest 60 The Arts Desk and The Line of Best Fit
- Career #3 of Young Thug's 5 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers The fifth best-reviewed Hip-Hop & Rap album of 2021 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Kyann-Sian Williams | 5/5 | 100 | 2021 | “Featuring a masterpiece of a collaboration with the late, great Mac Miller, this second studio album proves Thugger's all-time greatness” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 8/10 | 80 | 2021 | “Young Thug’s ascent to hip-hop upper echelons was complete long before his new album. Yet ‘PUNK’ truly sets the tone for his” |
| HipHopDX via Wikipediaby Armon Sadler | 4.0/5 | 80 | 2021 | “Get your hip hop album reviews, rap and R&B reviews from the best music review website on the web. We have all the latest music reviews from today’s top artists.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Paul A. Thompson | 7.1/10 | 71 | 2021 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jeff Ihaza | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2021 | “Young Thug Doesn't Dazzle But Suggests New Possibilities on ‘Punk” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Fred Thomas | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Harry Thorfinn-George | 3/5 | 60 | 2021 | “From underground curiosity to cult icon, now label head and superstar, Atlanta’s Young Thug has continued to reinvent himself, as well as rap at large, for the better part of…” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Leo Culp | 6/10 | 60 | 2021 | “Punk is an interesting ride, but it's far from Young Thug's greatest” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Young Thug
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2021
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply