Early reviews. Critics give Night Call an early B-Side Breakdown of 76 (Keeper), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Night Call
Most critics liked it: 5 of 7 liked it.
- Outlier 100 The Independent, 20 points above the next-highest score
- Lowest 60 The Telegraph and musicOMH
- Career #2 of Years & Years's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Years & Years's best-reviewed album here since Palo Santo (2018).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Helen Brown | 5/5 | 100 | 2022 | “Third album is stacked with solid tunes that reimagine the day-glo decade in winking, pulsating high-definition” |
| NME via Wikipediaby El Hunt | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | “As with previously records 'Communion' and 'Palo Santo', this record's subversion is smuggled into pounding, playful pop songs” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Cragg | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | “The actor-frontman returns as a solo act with 14 sweat-soaked bangers” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Matt Collar | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 7/10 | 70 | 2022 | “2018’s ‘Palo Santo’ saw Years & Years at their most complex. Lyrically, it’s intricate tales of dystopian science fiction were” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Larry Flick | 3/5 | 60 | 2022 | |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Ben Devlin | 3/5 | 60 | 2022 | “Olly Alexander's third album has its merits, but is a selection of pop songs that have no meaningful connection, and which one could hear anywhere” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Night Call in Years & Years's catalog
More from Years & Years
More Pop from around 2022
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply