Critics give Expo 86 a B-Side Breakdown of 75 (C), from 11 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 91.
The verdict on Expo 86
Most critics liked it: 7 of 11 liked it.
- Highest 91 The A.V. Club
- Outlier 50 PopMatters, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career Tied for #2 of Wolf Parade's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Wolf Parade's best-reviewed album here since Apologies to the Queen Mary (2005).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Steven Hyden | A- | 91 | 2010 | |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Michael Saba | 8.3/10 | 83 | 2010 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| Consequence via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Rudy K | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “Wolf Parade – Expo 86 review: Maybe the best synthesis of the band's schizoid sound yet.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Will Dean | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “Three album in, and Will Dean finds Canadian indie collective Wolf Parade sounding better than ever” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Paul Thompson | 7.5/10 | 75 | 2010 | “On their third full-length, the indie supergroup led by Dan Boeckner and Spencer Krug sounds more unified as their songwriting voices bleed together.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby David Marchese | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2010 | “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: June 29, 2010Label: Sub PopPart of what made Wolf Parade's opening double shot-2005's Apologies to the Queen Mary and” |
| No Ripcord via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | “A discipline between Wolf Parade members is their shifting nature to switch from project to project, bringing considerable bravado to their separate outfits. When it’s time for the so-called Can” | |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2010 | “Expo 86 is good, it’s just not great. Wolf Parade, the 2010 model, are good, not great. That's fine.” |
| PopMatters via Wikipedia | 2.5/5 | 50 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Expo 86 in Wolf Parade's catalog
More from Wolf Parade
More Indie & Alternative from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply