Critics give At Mount Zoomer a B-Side Breakdown of 70 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 90.
The verdict on At Mount Zoomer
6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 AllMusic
- Lowest 40 The Guardian
- Career #3 of Wolf Parade's 3 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Corey Kahn | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2008 | |
| Blender via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Amanda Petrusich | 7.7/10 | 77 | 2008 | “The two distinct, exceptional songwriters in Wolf Parade– Dan Boeckner and Spencer Krug– combine to create a record that seems focused on skewing darker, on sounding nastier, more perilous, and…” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Josh Modell | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2008 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2008 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Leah Greenblatt | B | 65 | 2008 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Steven Hyden | B- | 59 | 2008 | “Wolf Parade: At Mount Zoomer” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Rob Fitzpatrick | 2/5 | 40 | 2008 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
At Mount Zoomer in Wolf Parade's catalog
More from Wolf Parade
← Earlier Apologies to the Queen Mary (2005)Later → Expo 86 (2010)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2008
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply