Early reviews. Critics give A Bell Is a Cup an early B-Side Breakdown of 70 (C-), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on A Bell Is a Cup
Critics split on this one: scores run from 40 (Encyclopedia of Popular Music) to 90 (NME and 1 other).
- Highest 90 NME and AllMusic
- Lowest 40 Encyclopedia of Popular Music
- By the numbers The lowest score of Wire's 7 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Jack Barron | 9/10 | 90 | 1988 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2005 | |
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | B+ | 88 | 2005 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Joe Gross | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
| Spin Alternative Record Guide via Wikipediaby Eric Weisbard | 5/10 | 50 | 1995 | |
| Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin | 2/5 | 40 | 2007 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
A Bell Is a Cup in Wire's catalog
How these critics usually treat Wire
- Encyclopedia of Popular Music Harsher than usual35 points below the other critics here. Usually 14 points below on Wire's other albums (3).
- The Rolling Stone Album Guide Harsher than usual23 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Wire's other albums (3).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual24 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Wire's other albums (6).
- Spin Alternative Record Guide Harsher than usual23 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Wire's other albums (3).
From B-Side Guys
More from Wire
More Rock from around 1988
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply