Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
By the numbers: Regina Spektor's best-reviewed album here since Begin to Hope (2006). Scores ran from 60 (Paste) to 100 (Sputnikmusic).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | “Regina Spektor – What We Saw from the Cheap Seats review: What we saw from the cheap seats was Regina Spektor release another album. What we heard was her best…” | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Noel Murray | A- | 91 | 2012 | “Regina Spektor: What We Saw From The Cheap Seats” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Kyle Anderson | B | 85 | ||
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jonathan Keefe | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | “Beneath the yelps, gasps, and exaggerated accents, Regina Spektor is a romantic.” |
| NME via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | “Regina Spektor has come a mighty long way from the grotty East Village bars of the anti-folk scene at which she first started plying her hiccupping, jazz-garnished piano pop trade…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2012 | “Check out our album review of Artist's What We Saw From the Cheap Seats on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Megan Ritt | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2012 | “Not the magnum opus it might've been, but still really good.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Lindsay Zoladz | 6.3/10 | 63 | 2012 | “Now six albums into her career, Regina Spektor presents both her sentimentalism and her more childlike qualities with a certain defiance.” |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Ryan Reed | 6/10 | 60 | 2012 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Regina Spektor
More Indie & Alternative from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply