Critics give Moisturizer a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 16 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 80.
The verdict on Moisturizer
13 of 16 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 80 The Line of Best Fit, Louder Than War, Rolling Stone Australia and 8 more
- Lowest 60 The Needle Drop
- Career #2 of Wet Leg's 2 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Wet Leg's best-reviewed album here since Wet Leg (2022).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Line of Best Fitby Lana Marshall | 8/10 | 80 | Jul 11, 2025 | “Teeming with overt-love metaphors, insatiable lust and uncaring attitudes, Wet Leg's debut walked so moisturizer could run.” |
| Louder Than Warby Robert Plummer | 4.0/5 | 80 | Jul 6, 2025 | “The pride of the Isle of Wight are back with their storming second album. Now a fully-fledged five-piece band, Wet Leg offer a festival-friendly set of 12 more songs about…” |
| Rolling Stone Australiaby Conor Lochrie | 4/5 | 80 | Jul 9, 2025 | “U.K. indie-rockers Wet Leg party hard and travel fast on their great second album.” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jeremy Winograd | 4/5 | 80 | Jul 7, 2025 | “The album delves into more vulnerable subject matter, but the band’s propensity for catchy garage-punk remains intact.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield | 4/5 | 80 | Jul 9, 2025 | “Wet Leg's 'Moisturizer' Review” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly | 4/5 | 80 | Jul 11, 2025 | “On second album 'Moisturizer', Wet Leg return smarter, sexier and altogether stronger – read the NME album review” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby James Hall | 4/5 | 80 | 2025 | |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Cameron Sinclair Harris | 4/5 | 80 | Jul 9, 2025 | “A wonderfully crafted piece of work that cements the band’s staying power.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | Jul 9, 2025 | “After winning multiple Grammys and Brits, the Isle of Wight band explore love and sexuality on their second LP – but there’s still room for some barbed put-downs” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Richard Bowed | 8/10 | 80 | Jul 9, 2025 | “Much like any indie-rock band of the last decade, Wet Leg return with a slight weight of expectation following their wildly successful debut, which bagged” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Aimee Cliff | 7.8/10 | 78 | Jul 14, 2025 | |
| Northern Transmissionsby Sam Franzini | 7.7/10 | 77 | Jul 9, 2025 | “moisturizer by Wet Leg album review by Wet Leg by Sam Franzini for Northern Transmissions, the band's LP drops on September 11 via Domino” |
| Beats Per Minuteby Ray Finlayson | 73% | 73 | Jul 23, 2025 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” |
| XS Noizeby Iam Burn | 3.5/5 | 70 | Jul 11, 2025 | “Wet Leg’s origins go back to 2019 on the Isle of Wight, when Rhian Teasdale and Hester Chambers, both studying at Platform One College of Music, decided to” |
| The Needle Dropby Anthony Fantano | 6/10 | 60 | Jul 21, 2025 | “Not the moistest album you'll hear this year.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Wet Leg
More Indie & Alternative from around 2025
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply