Quebec

Ween – Quebec: B-Side Breakdown 76 (C) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Quebec by Ween
Released August 5, 2003
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Ween

Quebec

76
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 6 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown76Grade: C
Approval67%4 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Quebec an early B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Ween's best-reviewed album here since Chocolate and Cheese (1994).

020406080100The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 60AllMusic: 70Pitchfork: 77Uncut: 80Mojo: 80Tiny Mix Tapes: 90 Breakdown 76
The gist
Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90 “I HATE Ween. Now before you move on to the next review, I must explain why Ween exorcizes my inner most hatred and detestation. Perhaps it is their idiosyncrasies or…”
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2003
Mojo via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2003
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Eric Carr 7.7/10 77 2003 “…So I kinda mope around all day, dropping hints, thinking everybody forgot my birthday, then justn when I get …”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70 2003
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Roni Sarig 3/5 60 “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide”

More from Ween

See all Ween albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2003

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply