Vicious Lies and Dangerous Rumors

Big Boi – Vicious Lies and Dangerous Rumors: B-Side Breakdown 71 (C-) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Vicious Lies and Dangerous Rumors by Big Boi
Released December 11, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Big Boi

Vicious Lies and Dangerous Rumors

71
B-Side BreakdownGrade C- · 9 critics · 44% approval
B-Side Breakdown71Grade: C-
Approval44%4 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 91.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 50 (AllMusic) to 91 (Entertainment Weekly).

020406080100AllMusic: 50The Guardian: 60NME: 60Pitchfork: 61Spin: 70Rolling Stone: 80Slant: 80The A.V. Club: 88Entertainment Weekly: 91 Breakdown 71
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Kyle Anderson A- 91
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Will Butler B+ 88
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Simon Vozick-Levinson 4/5 80
Slant via Wikipediaby Ted Scheinman 4/5 80
Spin via Wikipediaby David Peisner 7/10 70
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Miles Raymer 6.1/10 61
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Rebecca Nicholson 3/5 60
NME via Wikipediaby Tom Howard 6/10 60
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman 2.5/5 50

More from Big Boi

See all Big Boi albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply