Critics give Viagr Aboys a B-Side Breakdown of 85 (B), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 100.
The verdict on Viagr Aboys
10 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 Dork
- Lowest 80 PopMatters, NME, musicOMH and 3 more
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Viagra Boys's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Cave World (80). The second best-reviewed Rock album of 2025 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dork via Wikipediaby Jake Hawkes | 5/5 | 100 | 2025 | |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Noah Barker | 9/10 | 90 | 2025 | “If you’ve clued into any number of previous Viagra Boys releases, Viagr Aboys will be unsurprising, with barn-burning dance punk, grooves fit for the Richter scale.” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Josh Crowe | 9/10 | 90 | 2025 | |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Quadros Karly | 8.5/10 | 85 | 2025 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Emily Votaw | 8/10 | 80 | 2025 | “Viagra Boys' self-titled album is a gleefully unhinged feat of epic silliness—just as musically brilliant as it is absurd, as willfully brutal as it is carefully constructed.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Tom Morgan | 4/5 | 80 | 2025 | |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Donovan Livesey | 4/5 | 80 | 2025 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2025 | |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Alex Doyle | 4/5 | 80 | 2025 | “Plenty to widen audiences’ expectations of the group.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming | 4/5 | 80 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Viagr Aboys in Viagra Boys's catalog
How these critics usually treat Viagra Boys
- musicOMH Harsher than usual5 points below the other critics here. Usually 12 points above on Viagra Boys's other albums (3).
More from Viagra Boys
More Rock from around 2025
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply