Critics give Ravedeath, 1972 a B-Side Breakdown of 84 (Keeper), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 100.
The verdict on Ravedeath, 1972
8 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 musicOMH
- Lowest 70 NME
- Career #2 of Tim Hecker's 4 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Tim Hecker's best-reviewed album here since Haunt Me, Haunt Me Do It Again (2001). The eighth best-reviewed album of 2011 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Daniel Paton | 5/5 | 100 | 2011 | “One of the most fascinating trends in experimental music in recent years has been the occasional slipping, almost by osmosis, of some very challenging” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Abi Bliss | 9/10 | 90 | 2011 | “Whatever grand plan Tim Hecker may or may not have had in mind here, let’s just say that much of Ravedeath, 1972 will put you in the position of a…” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Joe Colly | 8.6/10 | 86 | 2011 | “A decade into a career that found him perfecting an immediately recognizable approach to dark ambience, Tim Hecker makes what could be his best record.” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Christian Williams | A- | 85 | 2011 | “Tim Hecker: Ravedeath, 1972” |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Ned Raggett | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| NME via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2011 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Ravedeath, 1972 in Tim Hecker's catalog
How these critics usually treat Tim Hecker
- AllMusic About usual for them4 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Tim Hecker's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Tim Hecker's other albums (3).
More from Tim Hecker
← Earlier Haunt Me, Haunt Me Do It Again (2001)Later → Love Streams (2016)
More Electronic from around 2011
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply