Early reviews. Critics give (She Was A) Hotel Detective an early B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on (She Was A) Hotel Detective
3 of 5 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 95 Robert Christgau
- Lowest 60 NME
- Career Tied for #2 of They Might Be Giants's 16 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | A | 95 | 1987 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2003 | |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby J. D. Considine | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
| NME via Wikipedia | 6/10 | 60 | 2003 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
(She Was A) Hotel Detective in They Might Be Giants's catalog
How these critics usually treat They Might Be Giants
- NME Harsher than usual24 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on They Might Be Giants's other albums (6).
- Robert Christgau Kinder than usual20 points above the other critics here. Usually 11 points above on They Might Be Giants's other albums (6).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual14 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on They Might Be Giants's other albums (15).
- The Rolling Stone Album Guide About usual for them11 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on They Might Be Giants's other albums (6).
- Q About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on They Might Be Giants's other albums (5).
More from They Might Be Giants
More Indie & Alternative from around 1988
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply