Flood

They Might Be Giants – Flood: B-Side Breakdown 71 (C-) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Flood by They Might Be Giants
Released January 5, 1990
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
They Might Be Giants

Flood

71
B-Side BreakdownGrade C- · 6 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown71Grade: C-
Approval67%4 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 32 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Flood an early B-Side Breakdown of 71 (C-), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (Rolling Stone) to 85 (Pitchfork).

020406080100Rolling Stone: 40Los Angeles Times: 60Q: 80NME: 80AllMusic: 80Pitchfork: 85 Breakdown 71
The gist
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Quinn Moreland 8.5/10 85 2022
Q via Wikipediaby Peter Kane 4/5 80 2002
NME via Wikipediaby Jerry Smith 8/10 80 2002
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 4/5 80
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Chris Willman 3/5 60 1990 “And they might be big-time now that they're on a major label. Then again, probably not.”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Browne 2/5 40

More from They Might Be Giants

See all They Might Be Giants albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 1990

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply