Critics give Fuck Off Get Free We Pour Light on Everything a B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 93.
The verdict on Fuck Off Get Free We Pour Light on Everything
6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 93 Paste
- Lowest 60 The Independent
- Career #3 of Thee Silver Mt. Zion's 5 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Thee Silver Mt. Zion's best-reviewed album here since Kollaps Tradixionales (2010).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paste via Wikipediaby Robert Ham | 9.3/10 | 93 | 2014 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Vish Khanna | 9/10 | 90 | 2016 | “Fuck Off Get Free We Pour Light on Everything” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Randall Colburn | B+ | 88 | 2014 | “Noise gives way to change, and change gives way to hope.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 8.0/10 | 80 | 2014 | “The orchestro-punk Godspeed offshoot Thee Silver Mt. Zion's excellent seventh album examines the difficulties of keeping one’s moral compass steady in a society that’s becoming ever-more indifferent to the things…” |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Kate Lloyd | 7/10 | 70 | 2014 | “Having begun as a side project of Godspeed! You Black Emperor’s Efrim Menuck, their sound has journeyed from early post-rock experiments into the hinterlands of drone. ‘Austerity Blues’ sounds like…” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 3/5 | 60 | 2014 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Fuck Off Get Free We Pour Light on Everything in Thee Silver Mt. Zion's catalog
How these critics usually treat Thee Silver Mt. Zion
- Pitchfork About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Thee Silver Mt. Zion's other albums (4).
- AllMusic About usual for them11 points above the other critics here. Usually 13 points above on Thee Silver Mt. Zion's other albums (4).
More from Thee Silver Mt. Zion
More Indie & Alternative from around 2014
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply