Early reviews. Critics give Tired of Hanging Around an early B-Side Breakdown of 72 (C-), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Tired of Hanging Around
2 of 5 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 80 PopMatters and musicOMH
- Lowest 60 Uncut
- Career #2 of The Zutons's 3 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Michael Keefe | 8/10 | 80 | 2006 | |
| musicOMH via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| NME via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2006 | “Why does everyone like The Zutons? Bands who dress up as zombies and summon up strange reference points like Dr John, Devo and Area Code 615 should not, after all,…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Tired of Hanging Around in The Zutons's catalog
More from The Zutons
← Earlier Who Killed…… The Zutons? (2004)Later → You Can Do Anything (2008)
More Pop from around 2006
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply