Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.
By the numbers: Muse's best-reviewed album here since Black Holes and Revelations (2006). Scores ran from 40 (Rolling Stone) to 100 (The Arts Desk).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Joe Muggs | 5/5 | 100 | “Muse are one of the best advertisements in the world for silliness. When the Devon trio came along in the late Nineties, they found a niche for people who wished…” | |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia | 4.5/5 | 90 | “Muse – The Wow! Signal review: Take a bow” | |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Stephen Dalton | 4.5/5 | 90 | Jun 26, 2026 | “Super-focussed, densely layered and stacked with killer tunes” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | Jun 25, 2026 | “From Count Dracula organ to choirs crying in Latin, the Devon band are scenery-chewingly preposterous yet nuanced on this epic about extraterrestrial life” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Andrew Trendell | 4/5 | 80 | Jun 25, 2026 | “The NME review of Muse's 'The Wow! Signal': Matt Bellamy and co respond to heartache and the unknown with an update on their early sound” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Luke Winstanley | 8/10 | 80 | Jun 26, 2026 | “Muse’s last decade has been an unfortunate case of diminishing returns. After the tired allusions to classic rock theatre on the middling ‘Drones’, the” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Neil Z. Yeung | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Haydon Spenceley | 7/10 | 70 | “Ten albums in, Muse return with a full-length which returns them to their stadium-rocking, wide-ranging hard rocking best.” | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Liam Inscoe-Jones | 4.5/10 | 45 | Jul 1, 2026 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 2/5 | 40 | Jun 28, 2026 | “Muse wow us into submission on its 10th LP, 'The Wow! Signal” |
More from Muse
More Indie & Alternative from around 2026
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply