Life’s Too Good

The Sugarcubes – Life’s Too Good: B-Side Breakdown 88 (B+) from 5 critic reviews.

Album cover for Life’s Too Good by The Sugarcubes
Released April 25, 1988
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Sugarcubes

Life’s Too Good

88
B-Side BreakdownGrade B+ · 5 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown88Grade: B+
Approval100%5 of 5 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 14 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 5 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The sixth best-reviewed album of 1988 we've tracked. All 5 critics liked it, and the lowest score was 80, from Spin Alternative Record Guide.

020406080100Record Collector: 80Spin Alternative Record Guide: 80The Line of Best Fit: 90AllMusic: 90Los Angeles Times: 100 Breakdown 88
The gist
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Robert Hilburn 4/4 100 1988 “****THE SUGARCUBES. "Life's Too Good." Elektra.”
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Hayley Scott 9/10 90 2015 “An understated classic, and by far the band's best, the album that introduced Björk to the world still sounds vital 27 years since its initial release.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby John Dougan 4.5/5 90
Record Collector via Wikipediaby Sue Matiz 4/5 80 2015 “By the time “joke band” The Sugarcubes formed, its members were already veterans of Reykjavik’s DIY punk scene. While their previous”
Spin Alternative Record Guide via Wikipedia 8/10 80 2004

More Rock from around 1988

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply