The Inevitable End

Röyksopp – The Inevitable End: B-Side Breakdown 73 (C) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for The Inevitable End by Röyksopp
Released November 4, 2014
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Röyksopp

The Inevitable End

73
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 8 critics · 50% approval
B-Side Breakdown73Grade: C
Approval50%4 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 28 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 91.

By the numbers: Röyksopp's best-reviewed album here since The Understanding (2005). Scores ran from 50 (NME) to 91 (Entertainment Weekly).

020406080100NME: 50Pitchfork: 59The Guardian: 60Slant: 70PopMatters: 80AllMusic: 80Exclaim!: 90Entertainment Weekly: 91 Breakdown 73
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Madison Vain A- 91
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Scott Simpson 9/10 90 2014
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Ryan Lathan 8/10 80 2014 “Chaucer once coined the phrase, "there is an end to everything, to good things as well", thus illuminating the reality that all things under the sun have an”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Timothy Monger 4/5 80
Slant via Wikipediaby Franklin Jones 3.5/5 70 2014 “The Inevitable End excels when it splits the difference between brooding angst and wistful schmaltz.”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann 3/5 60 2014 “The duo’s final offering has excellent Scandipop mixed in a bit too much aimless drift, writes Michael Hann”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan 5.9/10 59 2014 “Though the Norwegian duo Röyksopp aren't calling it quits, Torbjørn Brundtland and Svein Berge have billed their new album as their last in the "traditional album format." The Inevitable End…”
NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly 5/10 50 2014 “Although they’ll possibly continue to make music in other forms, this is Röyksopp’s final album. Why be so conclusive? It’s odd, especially since ‘The Inevitable End’ is not a statement…”

More from Röyksopp

See all Röyksopp albums ranked

More Electronic from around 2014

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply