Critics give This Is Not the World a B-Side Breakdown of 72 (Keeper), from 11 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 80.
The verdict on This Is Not the World
8 of 11 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 80 DIY, PopMatters, musicOMH and 3 more
- Lowest 50 Slant
- Career #3 of The Futureheads's 3 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIYby Emma Swann | 4/5 | 80 | 2008 | “Just like a live set from the quartet, it’s all over far too quickly, but you can’t help ending up with a grin on your face.” |
| PopMattersby Zeth Lundy | 8/10 | 80 | 2008 | “The Futureheads are the Futureheads on their third full-length, This Is Not the World — rhythmically anxious, melodically electrifying, and almost” |
| musicOMHby Tim Lee | 4/5 | 80 | 2008 | “From Top 10 chasing hounds of love, to neutered puppies without even a record deal to their names, recent times have been hard for wor 'Heads. The” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2008 | |
| NME via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2008 | “If he dies, he dies.” So spake metaphorical commie fearmonger Ivan Drago as his opponent’s central nervous system spasmed its last all over a bloodstained canvas at the start of…” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Lindsey Thomas | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2008 | “This U.K. group's 2004 first album was a breakneck feat of dazzling harmonizing, while 2006's follow-up was a bit of a snoozer, but their third” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2008 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipedia | 6.2/10 | 62 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Betty Clarke | 3/5 | 60 | 2008 | |
| Slantby Dave Hughes | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2008 | “On their often charmless third full-length, the Futureheads jilt subtlety in favor of balls-to-the-wall rawk.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
This Is Not the World in The Futureheads's catalog
More from The Futureheads
More Indie & Alternative from around 2008
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply