Early reviews. Critics give Portamento an early B-Side Breakdown of 63 (D), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (The Guardian) to 80 (musicOMH). Only one of 7 critics liked it: musicOMH, at 80.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Helen Clarke | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Larry Fitzmaurice | 7.4/10 | 74 | 2011 | “Despite the well-fed egos, Jonathan Pierce and co.'s new album– one that features ugly, petty, real emotion and multiple references to death or dying– is a smaller, more intimate record…” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan | 7/10 | 70 | 2011 | “With a foppish yodel and a jaunty guitar shuffle, this Brooklyn band's self-titled 2010 debut LP slotted easily alongside descendants of the Smiths and” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Matt James | 7/10 | 70 | ||
| NME via Wikipediaby Mike Williams | 7/10 | 70 | 2011 | “The sleeve of [a]The Drums[/a]’ second album is a family photo of a young Jonathan Pierce standing next to a middle-aged woman, probably his gran. His eyes are photoshopped red,…” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 2/5 | 40 | 2011 | “The Drums' Portamento continues where last year's debut left off, with indie-pop arrangements of syncopated guitar and handclap grooves over which Jonny Pierce vents his emotional concerns in a fluting…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Rebecca Nicholson | 2/5 | 40 | 2011 | “The Drums? Rebecca Nicholson reckons they're dreary enough to be renamed the Glums” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More Indie & Alternative from around 2011
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.



Leave a Reply