Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
By the numbers: ANOHNI and the Johnsons's best-reviewed album here since I Am a Bird Now (2005). The top-rated Pop album of 2009 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Ann Powers | 4/4 | 100 | “Los Angeles Times blogs that were published between 2006 and 2013.” | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Andy Battaglia | A | 95 | 2009 | “Antony & The Johnsons: The Crying Light” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Leah Greenblatt | A- | 91 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Masters | 8.6/10 | 86 | 2009 | “On The Crying Light, Antony Hegarty remains fascinated with the transitions and overlaps between birth and life, life and death, this world and the next, but he expresses them in…” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2008 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Ash Dosanjh | 8/10 | 80 | 2009 | “There’s a fine line between sounding like a stroke victim with a speech impediment or a cherubim-like castrated choirboy. Sitting on the fence between these two is Antony Hegarty: a…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 3/5 | 60 | 2009 | “Antony's mournful wails were electrifying first time around. But enough's enough, says Alexis Petridis” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from ANOHNI and the Johnsons
More Pop from around 2009
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply