Critics give Hot Shots II a B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on Hot Shots II
6 of 8 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 90 AllMusic
- Lowest 60 Rolling Stone and The Guardian
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of The Beta Band's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Heroes to Zeros (77). The third best-reviewed Electronic album of 2001 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby John Bush | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Browne | B+ | 88 | 2001 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Matt LeMay | 8.6/10 | 86 | 2001 | “There's a reason that shampoo bottles tell you to rinse and repeat. And no, it isn't just to …” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Louis Pattison | 8/10 | 80 | 2004 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Louis Pattison | 8/10 | 80 | 2005 | “Monosyllabic interviewees that take to the stage dressed as dancing spacemen and gun-toting Mexican bandits. A feverishly-awaited debut album, dismissed as “fucking awful” by its brutally honest creators. If Travis…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Matt Hendrickson | 3/5 | 60 | 2001 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Maddy Costa | 3/5 | 60 | 2001 | “Beta Band's latest is so inventive and bizarre that even they like it, says Maddy Costa” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from The Beta Band
← Earlier The Beta Band (1999)Later → Heroes to Zeros (2004)
More Electronic from around 2001
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply