Critics give Nothing Lasts Forever a B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 69 to 90.
The verdict on Nothing Lasts Forever
6 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 musicOMH
- Lowest 69 Pitchfork
- Career #3 of Teenage Fanclub's 12 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Teenage Fanclub's best-reviewed album here since Grand Prix (1995).
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Steven Johnson | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2023 |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Peter Barry | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Tom Doyle | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 |
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Kieron Tyler | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Matt Collar | 4/5 | 80 | |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Adam Fink | 7/10 | 70 | 2023 |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 6.9/10 | 69 | 2023 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Nothing Lasts Forever in Teenage Fanclub's catalog
How these critics usually treat Teenage Fanclub
- AllMusic About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Teenage Fanclub's other albums (10).
- Pitchfork About usual for them11 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Teenage Fanclub's other albums (10).
- Mojo About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Teenage Fanclub's other albums (7).
- Record Collector About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Teenage Fanclub's other albums (3).
- Uncut About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Teenage Fanclub's other albums (7).
More from Teenage Fanclub
← Earlier Endless Arcade (2021)Later → Do Not Dare to Dream (2026)
More Rock from around 2023
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply