Taking the Long Way

The Chicks – Taking the Long Way: B-Side Breakdown 71 (C-) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Taking the Long Way by The Chicks
Released April 4, 2006
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The Chicks

Taking the Long Way

71
B-Side BreakdownGrade C- · 9 critics · 78% approval
B-Side Breakdown71Grade: C-
Approval78%7 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessContentiousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 52 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 10 to 95.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 10 (Slant) to 95 (Entertainment Weekly). The Chicks's best-reviewed album here since Home (2002).

020406080100Slant: 10The Guardian: 40The A.V. Club: 78AllMusic: 80PopMatters: 80Rolling Stone: 80Stylus Magazine: 85Pitchfork: 87Entertainment Weekly: 95 Breakdown 71
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia A 95
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 8.7/10 87
Stylus Magazine via Wikipedia B 85
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80
PopMatters via Wikipedia 8/10 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80
The A.V. Club via Wikipedia C+ 78
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 2/5 40 2006
Slant via Wikipediaby Jonathan Keefe 0.5/5 10 2006 “Martyr complexes rarely make for real art.”

More from The Chicks

See all The Chicks albums ranked

More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2006

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply