Critics give The Blue Hour a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (Keeper), from 11 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
The verdict on The Blue Hour
8 of 11 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 100 The Independent
- Lowest 60 NME, Q and Mojo
- Career Tied for #7 of Suede's 10 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Mark Beaumont | 5/5 | 100 | 2018 | “Suede offer up another sordid masterwork for their canon, while Dublin's indie folk band Villagers rediscover faith on their most daring record to date” |
| XS Noizeby Ben P Scott | 9/10 | 90 | 2018 | “Like many of the other legendary indie bands who graced the 90s, Suede are right back on their very best form, making music that sounds and FEELS essential.” |
| PopMattersby Charles Donovan | 8/10 | 80 | 2018 | “Suede were never really part of the oafish Britpop scene and their dark, dramatic new album Blue Hour makes this more apparent than ever.” |
| musicOMHby Chris White | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “Expanding into the realms of true concept album territory, here they team up with Alan Moulder for a record that’s hugely ambitious in scale” |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Peter Barry | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “Scrappers to the last, Suede have often thrived with something to fight against, be it departing band members, doubters, or the dark days of the early” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Daniel Dylan Wray | 8/10 | 80 | 2018 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Luke Turner | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “The band’s eighth album sees them explore the creepy countryside with a new-found vitality in grand and gothic style” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| NME via Wikipediaby Andrew Trendell | 3/5 | 60 | 2018 | “On their eighth album, Brett Anderson and co. take the road less travelled, exploring rural decay with cinematic lushness” |
| Q via Wikipediaby Laura Barton | 3/5 | 60 | 2018 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Andrew Perry | 3/5 | 60 | 2018 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Blue Hour in Suede's catalog
How these critics usually treat Suede
- The Independent Kinder than usual26 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on Suede's other albums (3).
- Mojo Harsher than usual18 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Suede's other albums (5).
- Q Harsher than usual18 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Suede's other albums (7).
- NME Harsher than usual18 points below the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Suede's other albums (8).
- AllMusic Harsher than usual7 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Suede's other albums (8).
- Uncut Kinder than usual4 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Suede's other albums (3).
More from Suede
More Indie & Alternative from around 2018
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply