Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 91.
By the numbers: Garbage's best-reviewed album here since Beautiful Garbage (2001).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Annie Zaleski | A- | 91 | 2016 | “Garbage gets loose on the superlative Strange Little Birds” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Sal Cinquemani | 4/5 | 80 | 2016 | “This is a band very much alive, and hungry, not simply a bunch of middle-aged rockers taking a victory lap.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Theon Weber | 8/10 | 80 | 2016 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: June 10, 2016Label: STUNVOLUMESome important noises on Garbage's sixth album, ranked, ascendingly: the whispery wobble” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Jordan Blum | 8/10 | 80 | 2016 | “Considering that they began roughly 25 years ago, Los Angeles quartet Garbage deserves applause simply for sticking around this long. After all, the band was” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly | 4/5 | 80 | 2016 | “Last year, Garbage celebrated the 20th anniversary of their self-titled debut album. The timing was impeccable – pop culture’s ever rotating wheel of influence had already spun back to the…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Zoe Camp | 7.0/10 | 70 | 2016 | “With their post-return jitters under control, Garbage have solidified that return with Strange Little Birds, their darkest, most intimate LP and the band’s strongest effort in 15 years.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2016 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Strange Little Birds on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Luke Winstanley | 7/10 | 70 | 2016 | “It may have been over 20 years since their classic debut, but Garbage are growing old gracefully. Their sixth release, ‘Strange Little Birds’,” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Garbage
More Indie & Alternative from around 2016
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply