Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 45 to 88.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 45 (Under the Radar) to 88 (Entertainment Weekly). The lowest score of Kacey Musgraves's 7 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Leah Greenblatt | B+ | 88 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Gabrielle Sanchez | B+ | 88 | 2021 | “Kacey Musgraves pens a modern divorce album with help from the classics in Star-Crossed” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jeremy Winograd | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “Kacey Musgraves's ‘Star-Crossed’ is just as accessible as its predecessor, but it’s also far afield of modern radio tropes.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Hannah Mylrea | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “The pop's dissection of a crumbling relationship is split into three parts, never collapsing under its own concept” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Sam Sodomsky | 7.7/10 | 77 | 2021 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jonathan Bernstein | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2021 | “Millennial country hero Kacey Musgraves' fifth album, 'Star-Crossed', grapples with breaking up and growing up.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Helen Brown | 3/5 | 60 | 2021 | “Grammy-winner’s new record was inspired by ‘Romeo and Juliet’, but it seldom matches the play’s rough passion” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes | 3/5 | 60 | 2021 | “The bliss of Musgraves’ Grammy-winning Golden Hour sours on this follow-up, with a breakup narrative that is a little too tidy” |
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Mark Moody | 4.5/10 | 45 | “What light through yonder window breaks? Suffice it to say on Kacey Musgraves’ Romeo and Juliet inspired break-up album, star-crossed, the light is not that shared with her Golden Hour.…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Kacey Musgraves
More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2021
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply