Tigers Blood

Waxahatchee – Tigers Blood: B-Side Breakdown 90 (A-) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Tigers Blood by Waxahatchee
Released March 22, 2024
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Waxahatchee

Tigers Blood

90 A-Side: the critics' top tier
B-Side BreakdownGrade A- · 6 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown90Grade: A-
Approval100%6 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 12 points of each other

An early A-Side. It earned the badge from its first 6 reviews. More outlets are still weighing in, and if their scores pull it below the line, the badge comes off.

020406080100The Independent: 80Pitchfork: 88AllMusic: 90The Line of Best Fit: 90Slant: 90NME: 100 Breakdown 90
The gist
NME via Wikipedia 5/5 100 “On her sixth album, Waxahatchee’s Katie Crutchfield keeps things intimate, letting her songwriting and performances soar”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipedia 9/10 90 “While Saint Cloud arguably represents the apex of Waxahatchee’s hook-savviness, Tigers Blood features flawlessly sculpted melodies as well as vocals that are more notably complex and lyrics that more thoroughly…”
Slant via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90 “The beautiful, serene instrumentation on ‘Tigers Blood’ dovetails with Waxahatchee’s gutting truth-telling.”
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 8.8/10 88
The Independent via Wikipedia 4/5 80 “Shakira swaps revenge for something more nuanced, while Waxahatchee and Adrianne Lenker double down on their previous albums’ brilliance, and Elbow return to the spare melodies and dark moods of…”

More from Waxahatchee

See all Waxahatchee albums ranked

More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2024

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply