Critics give Swoon a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 53 to 100.
The verdict on Swoon
6 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerrang! via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | 2009 | |
| NME via Wikipedia | 9/10 | 90 | 2009 | “A weird thing has been happening recently. Whales have started beaching themselves, committing suicide if you like, in their hundreds. Eighty – 80! – hurled themselves on to the sands…” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Jacob Oller | B | 85 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Leah Greenblatt | B- | 81 | ||
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | “Silversun Pickups – Swoon review: An impressive record from an impressive up and coming band.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Mikael Wood | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2009 | “These dreamy Los Angeles rockers keep the guitars thick and gauzy on the follow-up to their 2006 debut, Carnavas, which recalled vintage Smashing Pumpkins” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Fricke | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann | 3/5 | 60 | 2009 | “The LA quartet sound very much like a product of their city: heavily treated and polished, says Michael Hann” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipedia | 5.3/10 | 53 | 2009 | “Silversun Pickups, who generated more Smashing Pumpkins comparisons than any band this side of Zwan with their 2006 debut Carnavas, return for Album #2.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Swoon in Silversun Pickups's catalog
More from Silversun Pickups
More Indie & Alternative from around 2009
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply