Nothing’s Real

Shura – Nothing’s Real: B-Side Breakdown 77 (C+) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Nothing’s Real by Shura
Released July 7, 2016
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Shura

Nothing’s Real

77
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 10 critics · 70% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Grade: C+
Approval70%7 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Critics give Nothing’s Real a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.

The verdict on Nothing’s Real

7 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Q: 60Rolling Stone: 70Exclaim!: 70Pitchfork: 77PopMatters: 80NME: 80The Guardian: 80Clash: 80AllMusic: 80musicOMH: 90 Breakdown 77
The gist
musicOMH via Wikipediaby Rob Mesure 4.5/5 90 2016 “I'm pretty much the queen of awkward," Aleksandra Denton told Hunger, at the moment her self-produced single Touch struck viral gold. She went on to be”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Andrew Dorsett 8/10 80 2016 “The long-anticipated debut album of English singer Shura, who has been steadily releasing songs since "Touch" in 2014, reveals an artist already surprisingly”
NME via Wikipediaby Larry Bartleet 4/5 80 2016
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Harriet Gibsone 4/5 80 2016
Clash via Wikipediaby Lisa Henderson 8/10 80 2016
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes 7.7/10 77 2016 “On her latest record, Shura is at the vanguard of a scene of young queer pop stars who are updating the ’80s model of self-sufficient, fully liberated mainstream pop.”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Joe Levy 3.5/5 70 2016 “Our take on the U.K. singer's debut LP”
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Hannah Ziegler 7/10 70 2016
Q via Wikipediaby Hannah J. Davies 3/5 60 2016

More from Shura

See all Shura albums ranked

More Electronic from around 2016

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply