Seal

Seal – Seal: B-Side Breakdown 74 (C) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Seal by Seal
Released May 23, 1994
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Seal

Seal

74
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 8 critics · 75% approval
B-Side Breakdown74Grade: C
Approval75%6 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 34 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 95.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Seal's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Human Being (66). Scores ran from 40 (NME) to 95 (Entertainment Weekly).

020406080100NME: 40Robert Christgau: 55Los Angeles Times: 75Rolling Stone: 80The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 80Encyclopedia of Popular Music: 80AllMusic: 90Entertainment Weekly: 95 Breakdown 74
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby James Bernard A 95
AllMusic via Wikipediaby MacKenzie Wilson 4.5/5 90
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christian Wright 4/5 80
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby James Hunter 4/5 80
Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin 4/5 80
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Dennis Hunt 3/4 75 1994
Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau Dud 55
NME via Wikipediaby Mark Sutherland 4/10 40

More from Seal

See all Seal albums ranked

More R&B & Soul from around 1994

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply