Sweet Oblivion

Screaming Trees – Sweet Oblivion: B-Side Breakdown 84 (B) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Sweet Oblivion by Screaming Trees
Released September 8, 1992
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Screaming Trees

Sweet Oblivion

84
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 8 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown84Grade: B
Approval100%8 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Critics give Sweet Oblivion a B-Side Breakdown of 84 (B), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 75 to 100.

The verdict on Sweet Oblivion

8 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.

  • Highest 100 Select
  • Lowest 75 Los Angeles Times
  • Reputation 81 90 at release, then five or more years later
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Screaming Trees's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Dust (80).
020406080100Los Angeles Times: 75Q: 80Kerrang!: 80NME: 80AllMusic: 80Entertainment Weekly: 88Spin Alternative Record Guide: 90Select: 100 Breakdown 84
Select via Wikipediaby Andrew Perry 5/5 100 2004
Spin Alternative Record Guide via Wikipediaby Michael Azzerad 9/10 90 2004
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Jim Farber B+ 88 1992
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2004
Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Chris Watts 4/5 80 1992
NME via Wikipedia 8/10 80 1992
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Steve Huey 4/5 80
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby James Martin McOmber 3/4 75 1992

More from Screaming Trees

See all Screaming Trees albums ranked

More Rock from around 1992

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply