Fumbling Towards Ecstasy

Sarah McLachlan – Fumbling Towards Ecstasy: B-Side Breakdown 84 (B) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Fumbling Towards Ecstasy by Sarah McLachlan
Released October 22, 1993
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Sarah McLachlan

Fumbling Towards Ecstasy

84
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 9 critics · 89% approval
B-Side Breakdown84Grade: B
Approval89%8 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Critics give Fumbling Towards Ecstasy a B-Side Breakdown of 84 (B), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 63 to 100.

The verdict on Fumbling Towards Ecstasy

8 of 9 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.

  • Highest 100 Chicago Tribune
  • Lowest 63 Los Angeles Times
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Sarah McLachlan's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Surfacing (75). The second best-reviewed Pop album of 1993 we've tracked.
020406080100Los Angeles Times: 63The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 80PopMatters: 80Rolling Stone: 80Pitchfork: 82Slant: 90AllMusic: 90Entertainment Weekly: 95Chicago Tribune: 100 Breakdown 84
The gist
Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Dan Kening 4/4 100 1994 “Sarah McLachlan Fumbling Towards Ecstasy (Arista) (STAR)(STAR)(STAR)(STAR) This a terrific album from a gifted 26-year-old Canadian who is mature beyond her years. Lyrically, McLachlan’s themes include betrayal without bitterness…”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Bock A 95 2003
Slant via Wikipediaby Sal Cinquemani 4.5/5 90 2003 “The trouble with the album’s title is that she never fumbles.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andrew Leahey 4.5/5 90
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ivy Nelson 8.2/10 82 2017 “The Canadian singer-songwriter’s third record is a fascinating outlier in her catalog, an unsparing and expansive album written in the mountains of Quebec following traumatic experiences in her life.”
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Richard Skanse 4/5 80 2004 “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Andrew Gilstrap 8/10 80 2008 “By all rights, 1991's Solace should have broken Sarah McLachlan into the mainstream. By the time of its release, McLachlan had worked out some of the”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Elysa Gardner 4/5 80 1994
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Richard Cromelin 2.5/4 63 1994 “SARAH McLACHLAN "Fumbling Towards Ecstasy" Arista * * 1/2 On McLachlan's third album, her singing is formal and studied, like the performance of an actress portraying a New Age troubadour…”

More from Sarah McLachlan

See all Sarah McLachlan albums ranked

More Pop from around 1993

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply