Critics give Fumbling Towards Ecstasy a B-Side Breakdown of 84 (B), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 63 to 100.
The verdict on Fumbling Towards Ecstasy
8 of 9 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 100 Chicago Tribune
- Lowest 63 Los Angeles Times
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Sarah McLachlan's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Surfacing (75). The second best-reviewed Pop album of 1993 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Dan Kening | 4/4 | 100 | 1994 | “Sarah McLachlan Fumbling Towards Ecstasy (Arista) (STAR)(STAR)(STAR)(STAR) This a terrific album from a gifted 26-year-old Canadian who is mature beyond her years. Lyrically, McLachlan’s themes include betrayal without bitterness…” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Bock | A | 95 | 2003 | |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Sal Cinquemani | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2003 | “The trouble with the album’s title is that she never fumbles.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andrew Leahey | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ivy Nelson | 8.2/10 | 82 | 2017 | “The Canadian singer-songwriter’s third record is a fascinating outlier in her catalog, an unsparing and expansive album written in the mountains of Quebec following traumatic experiences in her life.” |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Richard Skanse | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Andrew Gilstrap | 8/10 | 80 | 2008 | “By all rights, 1991's Solace should have broken Sarah McLachlan into the mainstream. By the time of its release, McLachlan had worked out some of the” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Elysa Gardner | 4/5 | 80 | 1994 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Richard Cromelin | 2.5/4 | 63 | 1994 | “SARAH McLACHLAN "Fumbling Towards Ecstasy" Arista * * 1/2 On McLachlan's third album, her singing is formal and studied, like the performance of an actress portraying a New Age troubadour…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Sarah McLachlan
More Pop from around 1993
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply