Early reviews. Critics give Spirituals an early B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Spirituals
5 of 7 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 80 The Telegraph, NME, musicOMH and 2 more
- Lowest 73 Paste
- Career #4 of Santigold's 5 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Santigold's best-reviewed album here since Master of My Make-Believe (2012).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Emma Madden | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Mark Beaumont | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | “Four albums on from her epochal 2008 debut ‘Santogold’, the artist proves she's still at the head of the stampede she started” |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Ben Hogwood | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | “Born in lockdown, Santi White's latest project is both old and new at the same time, drawing on the human spirit, but using cutting edge electronics to do it” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Kadish Morris | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | “Inspired by African American folk, the singer-songwriter’s latest is a heartfelt lockdown journey through loneliness, triumph and rage” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Heven Haile | 7.4/10 | 74 | 2022 | |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Elise Soutar | 7.3/10 | 73 | 2022 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Spirituals in Santigold's catalog
How these critics usually treat Santigold
- Pitchfork About usual for them5 points below the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on Santigold's other albums (4).
- AllMusic About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Santigold's other albums (4).
More from Santigold
More Rock from around 2022
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply