Critics give 99¢ a B-Side Breakdown of 71 (C-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 82.
The verdict on 99¢
4 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 82 Paste
- Lowest 60 Slant, The Guardian and Exclaim!
- By the numbers The lowest score of Santigold's 5 albums with a Breakdown.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paste via Wikipediaby Stephen F. Kearse | 8.2/10 | 82 | 2016 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Lee Adcock | 8/10 | 80 | 2016 | “The brightest and biggest album she’s ever made” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2015 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Joe Dolan | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2016 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Cameron Cook | 6.8/10 | 68 | 2016 | “After her darker sophomore effort 2012's Master of My Make-Believe, Santigold returns with a sunshine-bright pop album, shaded with biting commentary on consumerism and the price of art. It comes…” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Jonathan Wroble | 3/5 | 60 | 2016 | “99¢ is springy, bright, and almost flippant with regard to issues of identity and authenticity.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Phil Mongredien | 3/5 | 60 | 2016 | “The Philadelphia singer mixes political verve with pop vigour on her new album” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Ryan McNutt | 6/10 | 60 | 2016 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
99¢ in Santigold's catalog
How these critics usually treat Santigold
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual3 points below the other critics here. Usually 12 points below on Santigold's other albums (4).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Santigold's other albums (4).
More from Santigold
← Earlier Master of My Make-Believe (2012)Later → Spirituals (2022)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2016
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply